|
From the Director, Dr. David F. Bush
The Coach’s Corner is a place for those engaged in executive coaching to
share ideas about how this practice can be made more effective. We hope that
this will become a place for dialog, for innovative practices, and the sharing
of ideas. Cases, essays, and suggestions are all welcomed. To submit your ideas
send an email to:
david.bush@villanova.edu
Tag Team Coaching
My colleague, Richard J. Anthony, Sr. and I have worked with clients where we
alternately shared the giving of feedback and assisted with raising issues about
strategy selection for goal attainment. A number of coaches currently promote
the “tag-team” approach. Ken Blanchard and Don Shula, in their Little Book of
Coaching, use the tag-team approach to impart the five leadership secrets in
COACH.
C is for conviction-drive = never compromise your beliefs
O is for over learning: practice until it is perfect
A is for audible-ready: know when to change
C is for consistency: respond consistently to performance
H is for Honesty-based: walk your talk
Assessment Based Coaching (ABC)
In 1989 and 1990, Richard Andrulis and I developed Assessment Based Coaching
(ABC) as part of an extensive Quality Team Facilitator Selection and Development
program that was created for Baxter Wellmon, who was at that time General
Manager of the Stations Division of Conrail. ABC starts with an assessment of
relevant skills and abilities, which is followed by feedback sessions and
coaching. Assessment instruments are selected based on the goals for the
individual or group. Today we make frequent use of the EQ Map. The assessment
helps the client create goals based on the current situation. The coach’s help
the client select tactics and strategies for achieving the goals selected. The
assessments keep the process grounded.
Suggested Reading
Win-Win Partnerships: Be on the Leading Edge with Synergistic Coaching by
Steven J. Stowell, Ph.D. and Matt M. Starcevich, Ph.D. CMOE Press, Salt Lake
City, UT: 1996.
"In a time when everyone is moving faster, trying to do more with less, and
with high technology creating the 'virtual relationship' - we need the skills
and training to build 'learning relationships,' and engage others in productive
dialogue. This is what the authors call 'coaching.' It is the art of
facilitating the flow of information, stimulating creativity, and building
honest consensus. Coaching skills and values revitalize and rejuvenate the
relationships in small or large organizations and even in schools and families."
Coaching Ethics: the Perception and Reality of Confidentiality
For the Coaching Process to have credibility both parties must develop
mutual trust. For the client to disclose relevant information, the
coach must appear worthy of trust. As Covey has pointed out for years,
we appear to be worthy of trust when we demonstrate that we can be
trusted. I recently heard a story of a coach who lost a client by
creating the perception of being unworthy of trust. During a coaching
session, the name of a third party person with whom the client was
developing a referral relationship entered the conversation. The coach
responded to the name by sharing some unflattering gossip about the
third party. This behavior caused the client to wonder if the coach
might casually divulge similar confidential information about others,
including the client. The coaching relationship was terminated
shortly. Remember, if you wish to be worthy of trust, you must maintain
both the perception and the reality of confidentiality. What is said
here stays here.
|