|
Note: It is assumed that the current course distribution requirements in the
History of Philosophy – one course in Ancient Philosophy, one course in Medieval
Philosophy, one course in Modern Philosophy and one course in post-Hegelian
Philosophy – will have been completed before the exam. No later than one week before the fall semester of the third year, full time
students must without exception present the Director of Graduate Studies a
portfolio of four papers submitted to satisfy the requirements for seminars
taken in their normal course of study in the previous four semesters. The
portfolios will be reviewed by a subcommittee of the Graduate Committee. One
week before the fall break, this subcommittee will present students with a list
of questions that will form the basis of an oral examination to be administered
in the week after the fall break. The oral exam will be graded on the following
scale: pass, low pass, failure. This grade will become part – together with the
portfolio, the record of course grades, the record of incomplete courses and
other evidence of professional preparation – of a comprehensive evaluation by
the Graduate Committee of each student’s qualification to be admitted to the
Ph.D. level of the graduate program. The results of this comprehensive
evaluation will be communicated to students before the Thanksgiving holiday.
The portfolio should be comprised of four well-written and cogently argued
papers that taken together clearly demonstrate a grounding in the history of
philosophy. The papers may but need not be reworked by students prior to
submitting them as part of their portfolio. The papers should be chosen by
students as representative of their preparation to advance to the next level in
the graduate program. At least one of these papers must be on a subject in the
history of philosophy from the Ancient to the Medieval period. At least one of
these papers must be on a subject in the history of philosophy from the Modern
period, up to and including Hegel. All four papers must be presented with a word
count and must be 6000-7000 words long, including footnotes.
The subcommittee will be formed by the graduate director from a regular rotation
of faculty serving on the Graduate Committee.
The list of questions presented to students will be drawn from the papers
students submit in their portfolio. Students will be presented with no more than
ten questions. Which of these questions are asked in the course of the oral
examination will be decided exclusively by the examining subcommittee.
The oral examination will test a student’s knowledge of the history, tradition
and transmission of the conceptual variation in the areas represented by the
papers in the student’s portfolio. It will last no longer than 90 minutes.
A student will pass the oral exam if and only if she or he clearly demonstrates
a thorough and nuanced knowledge of the history, tradition and transmission of
conceptual variation in the areas of the history of philosophy and the
disciplines of philosophy represented by her or his portfolio.
A student will qualify for a low pass of the oral exam if she or he clearly
demonstrates an adequate knowledge of the history, tradition and transmission of
the conceptual areas of the history of philosophy and the disciplines of
philosophy represented by her or his portfolio.
The oral exam will be judged a failure if the student demonstrates only a
cursory knowledge of the history, tradition and transmission of conceptual
variation in the areas of the history of philosophy and the disciplines of
philosophy represented by her or his portfolio.
The comprehensive evaluation will take into consideration the quality of the
student’s course work, the number of incompletes the student is carrying, the
quality of the portfolio and the grade on the oral exam. On the basis of this
comprehensive evaluation, students will be either recommended for the MA and
invited to matriculate at the next level of the PhD program or recommended for a
terminal MA. Appeals will be handled on a case by case basis.
|