Student Grade Appeals & Complaints Against Faculty
The purpose of these Guidelines is to provide a mechanism for the
review of student grade appeals and complaints regarding faculty
performance within the framework of existing University, college and
department policies and rules. For this reason those policies and rules
may not themselves be the proper subject matter of a complaint under
these Guidelines. Normally, the resolution of grade appeals or
complaints will proceed by the following route: (1) to the chair of the
department (program director of the program in the College of Nursing)
involved, then if necessary, (2) to the committee constituted to handle
complaints, and finally if necessary, (3) to the dean of the college or
where appropriate the Graduate Dean of Liberal Arts and Sciences. The
University, however, believes that each student and faculty deserves to
be treated as an individual. Consequently, it is impossible to develop a
policy that will govern or control every situation. The following
Procedures were created to apply in most situations that may occur;
however, where the faculty member, dean and the Vice President for
Academic Affairs believe that the circumstances may require special
consideration, e.g. where the complaint is of a very personal and
sensitive nature, the Procedures may not be followed or used in every
respect. In no event, however, shall a deviation from these Procedures
be permitted with respect to the obligation of the committee under
section III to rely in its decision making only upon information which
has been communicated to the faculty member, thus permitting the faculty
member the opportunity to respond. These Procedures may be modified at
the University’s discretion according to the University’s norms and
procedures. In the sequel, "chair" shall also imply program director
and "dean" shall likewise imply Graduate Dean of Liberal Arts and
Sciences where appropriate. These Procedures apply to student grade
appeals and complaints. Individuals who are not University students may
not utilize these procedures. I. Faculty
Performance Complaints
A. Student complaints concerning an instructor’s handling
of a class, classroom presentation, professional demeanor, or course
policies should be directed to the chair of the faculty member
involved. If the complaint is against the chair, these procedures
shall be modified such that the dean shall undertake the
responsibility as the chair under the Guidelines and the Vice
President for Academic Affairs (or his or her designate) shall
undertake the responsibilities of the dean under these Guidelines.
Normally, such complaints should be made within six months of the
end of the course in which the complaint arose. B.
Identified Complaints: When a person makes a complaint and provides
his or her name, the chair will advise the individual to approach
the faculty member. The chair’s goal will be to arrange a meeting of
the parties. If the complainant does not agree to a joint meeting,
the chair will advise the faculty member of the details. If the
complainant requests that his or her identity remain confidential or
the chair considers it appropriate, the identity of the complainant
will remain confidential. The chair will inform the complainant of
the results of the meeting with the faculty member. C.
Anonymous Complaints: The chair should express displeasure with any
anonymous complaint and point out that such complaints (if made by
telephone) will not be accepted. If an anonymous written complaint
arrives, the chair should inform the faculty member of the details
of the complaint. D. The faculty member shall be presumed
to have acted appropriately unless otherwise determined in
accordance with these guidelines. E. The chair shall make
reasonable efforts to mediate the complaint. The chair may consult
with others in connection with his or her review of the complaint.
In the event that the complaint cannot be amicably resolved in the
chair’s judgment, the chair may make such disposition of the
complaint as the chair deems warranted. The chair shall ordinarily
communicate his or her disposition of the complaint to the student
initiating the complaint and the faculty member. F. If
either the student or the faculty member is dissatisfied with the
chair’s disposition of the complaint, she or he may contact the
department committee constituted to handle complaints. This elected
or appointed standing committee of the department should be duly
constituted following the department’s own policy. If a department
has too few members to reasonably form such a committee the
department, less the faculty member involved, shall constitute a
committee of the whole. The student or faculty member should present
her or his complaint via a formal written and signed statement to
the committee within seven days of the chair’s disposition of the
matter. The committee shall consider the complaint in accordance
with the procedures described in Section III below.
II. Grade
Complaints
A. Student complaints concerning a grade should be directed to the
chair of the faculty member involved. The chair shall urge a student
who brings a complaint about a grade in the first instance to try to
resolve the matter with the course instructor. That failing, the
chair should attempt to resolve the issue between the student and
instructor. The chair may consult with others in connection with his
or her review of the complaint. Normally, such complaints should be
made within six months of the end of the course in which the grade
was given.
If the complaint is against the chair, it should be directed to the
dean and these procedures shall be modified such that the dean shall
undertake the responsibilities of the chair under these Guidelines
and the Vice President for Academic Affairs (or his or her
designate) shall undertake the responsibilities of the dean under
these Guidelines.
B. In the event that the complaint cannot be amicably resolved in
the chair’s judgment, the chair, may make such disposition of the
complaint as the chair deems warranted. The chair shall ordinarily
communicate his or her disposition of the complaint to the student
initiating the complaint and the faculty member.
C. In a particularly difficult case the chair may elect to refer the
matter to the departmental committee for fact finding and
recommendations. The committee shall consider the chair’s referral
of the matter in accordance with the procedures described in Section
III and send its recommendations in writing to the chair. The chair
shall be guided in his or her determination by widely accepted
professional norms of academic freedom which normally make the
instructor the focus of authority in determining grades. The chair
shall communicate his or her determination of the complaint to the
dean, the faculty member involved, and the complainant. In general,
the formal procedures described below will only take place after a
final course grade has been given.
III. Department or College Committee Upon a referral from the chair in the case of a grade complaint or
upon a written complaint from a student of faculty member
dissatisfied with a chair’s disposition of a faculty performance
complaint, the committee shall meet within a reasonable time to
determine how best to handle the review of the particular matter.
The committee may convene hearings appropriate in its judgement to
the particular situation presented. The committee procedures may
include by example and not by limitation, individual interviews,
closed hearings, and review of documentation. The committee is not
bound, however, by formal rules of evidence. All interviews and
hearings shall be conducted in appropriate University facilities
designated by the committee and shall be closed to the public. Every
committee member need not attend every interview or hearing session.
The University does not permit legal counsel to participate in
hearings or interviews of the committee on behalf of the student or
faculty member. Only information which has been communicated to the
faculty member, thus permitting the faculty member an opportunity to
respond thereto, shall be relied upon by the committee in reaching
its conclusions. The committee shall reach its decision by majority
vote. In the case of a grade complaint, the Committee shall provide its
findings of fact and written recommendations to the chair for
consideration in the chair’s determination of the matter. In making
its recommendation to the chair, the committee shall base its
decision on clear and convincing evidence and on the principle that
the locus of authority in determining grades normally is placed with
the instructor, especially in those cases where the instructor is
acting in accordance with principles that have been clearly
delineated in the course syllabus. In the case of a faculty
performance complaint, the committee shall provide its findings of
fact and written decision to the student, faculty member and chair.
The Committee shall make its decision based on the preponderance of
evidence it has reviewed.
IV. Appeals Process In the extraordinary case when a student or faculty member is
unwilling to accept the decision of the chair with respect to a
complaint or the departmental complaint committee with respect to a
faculty performance complaint, she or he may appeal the decision in
writing to the dean within seven days of that decision but only on
the following basis:
a. material procedural defect in the Committee, or
b. material procedural defect in the chair’s handling of the matter,
or
c. new material evidence not reasonably available at the time of the
committee or chair’s review of the matter.
All written deliberations concerning the complaint shall be
forwarded to the dean to aid in the decision. In the course of his
or her review of the appeal, the dean may, but shall not be required
to, consult with others, interview the complainant, faculty member,
chair, committee members, or others. The decision of the dean shall
be final. These procedures supersede University Policy no. 140 titled
"Procedural Norms for Deans or Chairs in Case of Complaints Against
Faculty." V. Complaints Involving Sexual Harassment Cases of grade complaints or faculty performance complaints which
may constitute sexual harassment under the University’s Sexual
Harassment Policy shall be referred, with the complainant’s
permission, to the University’s Sexual Harassment Officer for
resolution under the
Sexual Harassment Guidelines. |